 |
The Intersection of Creativity: Human Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence |
Do we not be completely surprised by the fast daily discoveries of this intelligence when we imagine that we escalate the ladder of humanity to higher levels where we are about to achieve joy and stability in existence?
Do we not live in the time of the deep contradictions between technological progress and moral and social challenges?
Technological development and creativity
There is no doubt that artificial intelligence can provide enormous opportunities for creativity and progress in various fields, whether scientific, technological, artistic or literary.
Moral and social challenges
We must face the current reality of humanity and moral challenges, including conflict, injustice, equality and more.
Anyone, regardless of the amount of his wealth in these arts, can now compete with experienced creators. Although this seems positive and liberal for creativity, it has great effects on the relationship between individual creative talents and collective heritage.
The ability to compete and participate in the areas of creativity and arts, thanks to modern technologies and available means of communication, represents a major transformation in cultural and artistic dynamics.
This shift brings more diversity and allows individuals to express themselves completely, but it faces new challenges:
1. Increase diversity and inclusion
Technology allowed many people to express themselves and compete in creative fields. This increases cultural diversity and enhances totalitarianism.
2. Quality and originality challenges
With the increase in the number of participants in the arts and creative fields, quality and originality challenges may arise as it is difficult to distinguish real talents, that is, the original work of the abundance of content.
3. Impact on cultural heritage
4. The shift in the patterns of cultural consumption
This shift may lead to a change in the patterns of cultural consumption, where individuals can now experience and consume a wide range of arts and cultures with a click of a button.
5. The need for excellence and vocational evaluation
With a lot of content and creativity, it may be difficult to distinguish between distinct and natural content. This is where the careful and specialized evaluation comes. German philosopher Martin Heidegger warned of the blind follow-up of technology, In his book; "The Question Concerning Technology".
For him, technology is not just a neutral and flexible tool in human hands, but it is difficult for humans to define and control it.
Heidegger continues: technology is a threat to existence, which is the existence in which human creativity is the result of cooperation and partnership between man and nature. Because when the mind becomes technological, it only thinks about nature as something that can be measured, modified and exploited.
From the words of Heidegger, we can say that technology is a stand-alone mental system, which does not care about the relationships between man and the universe, but it is only concerned with profit and material attention, whether at the expense of the earth or at the expense of humans.
Through Heidegger's philosophy, we learn about the critical vision of technology and its impact on humans and the world around it. Here are some of the main points highlighted by Heidegger:
1. Technology as an independent mental system
Heidegger notes that technology is not just a tool in humans, but rather a mental system that develops, is affected by itself, and causes human formation the way he thinks and behaves.
2. A threat to the original existence
Heidegger believes that technology is a threat to the natural relationship between man and the universe, as it can cause the human mind to deviate from natural communication and interaction with the environment.
3. Loss of communication with nature
Heidegger notes that technology can lead to the loss of human communication by nature, which reduces its value to the mere exploitation and control.
4. Breaking the relationship between a human and the universe, and between human and his brother
This idea indicates that technology may disintegrate cultural and social relations that characterize humans with their environment and with each other, which affects belonging and social communication.
3. Systematic risks
This indicates the presence of analogues of the influence of technology on culture and society, such as the importance of cultural identity or the consequences of continuous dependence on social media.
Technology companies have invented an artificial intelligence system called (DALL.E), a name derived from two words: "Salvador Dali", the famous Spanish painter (Dali), and the name "Wall" robot, the hero of the movie (WALL.E) . The choice of the name comes to indicate a clear meaning, according to which the innovative system aims to achieve creativity that is the result of a person’s interaction with the machine, or an overlap between their intelligence, so that the decisiveness is difficult if the work accomplished is a humanitarian or technological programming.
It is sufficient for you to write two words on the computer, such as "the table" and "head", "the monkey", "book", "clouds" and "fire", or any two words you choose, so you can win artistic structures of these words are endless, so you choose Among the structures is what you want to enter into your intellectual ownership, so that you can sell it or progress it to compete in technical competitions and the like.
This matter calls for confusion, and urges us to the question: Is this creativity from man, or is it from the machine? Or is they together?
The question sheds light on the challenges and inquiries raised by modern technology and developments of artificial intelligence. When creativity is the result of the interaction of man and the machine, it is difficult to determine the source of creativity clearly.
What makes this question complicated is that artificial intelligence is based on programming and algorithms designed by man, so it mainly reflects the ability and creativity of programmers and engineers. However, artificial intelligence can be able to make complex analyzes and create solutions that exceed human ability in some cases, making the line between human creativity and the creativity of the machine sometimes unclear.
This interaction between a person and the machine opens the door for complex moral and legal questions about the ownership of creativity and intellectual property rights. It also raises new challenges regarding evaluation, recognition of creativity, and the presentation of artistic and literary certificates, and others.
Consequently, it appears that creativity resulting from the interaction of human and the machine is a complex mix of efforts and contributions from both, and it may be sometimes difficult to determine the source of creativity clearly.
